H-REAP Design and Deployment Guide – Cisco Learning Read more about controller, lwapp, configuration, wireless, configured and wlans. HReap Design and Deployment Guide: /products_tech_noteashtml Configuring Hybrid REAP. 27, 24, , 2/8/, Wireless LAN IPv6 Client Deployment Guide New! 55, 14, , 6/29/, H-Reap Design and Deployment Guide.
|Published (Last):||11 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||18.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
What is H-REAP mode?
So fail-over is not seamless. Am I right about that?
Searching high and low for this but could not still get my hands on one. It is easy to add them to the group on their currently connected controller, just select each AP from the drop-down list within the H-REAP Group to add them. I think we’ll see some big announcements from those two in 1H Because it should already know as it is configured this way before its primary WLC goes offline for some gkide. If you have code version 7. Hi Andrew Thank you for useful info and I really enjoy reading it.
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the post. First, several guidelines are recommended for successful deployment.
Revolution Wi-Fi: H-REAP Deployment Guidelines and Feature Limitations
In addition to feature limitations that apply to all H-REAP operational states, the following limitations also apply when the AP goes into standalone mode after losing connection to the controller. Andrew vonNagy March 1, at 6: First, authentication timers on clients; they expect to have authentication complete within a reasonable amount of time, and if not then they will assume it has failed and try to reconnect and start the authentication process over.
Administrators should design a solution around these requirements as best as possible.
Anonymous August 24, at 7: Could you kindly point me to a Cisco doco that specifies the same pls?. And we are noticing the loop in to the network? Anonymous March 1, at 1: Andrew vonNagy August 26, at 2: Depolyment Martin June 10, at 5: Not exactly all of the changes make it into the release notes, but most of the major ones do.
Ensure the secondary WLC is in the same mobility group, and ideally configured on each AP in the controller preferences. Motorola is trying to get their with their WiNG product but will take some time.
Why must the latency not exceed 2 seconds v.
Troy Martin June 15, at When we initiate fail-over from primary controller local to secondary controller central with ms or more WAN latency AP fail-over works fine however when AP gets associated to central controller the clients connected to the AP gets disconnectes and re-authetication takes place. Aerohive has an advantage because they were able to develop their product without existing product roadmaps and feature sets to support and upgrade along the way.
I can be reached at samuel. Andrew vonNagy June 29, at 8: Anonymous July 2, at Andrew vonNagy December 13, at 2: Xirrus does something similar, with a controller in every AP and coordination among multiple APs.
I have not yet evaluated the Aerohive solution, but have some gear that I will be looking at soon. Additionally, feature limitations when using this mode of operation need to be clearly understood by network administrators prior to evaluating and deploying an H-REAP solution. Kristjan, No configuration is replicated between controllers.
Would you able to advise me,by having APs in one group, what effects it would have on network? Anonymous November 15, at 6: But it’s still fairly manual. Yes, you should make the configurations identical on both controllers, except for things that must be different like interface IP addresses. Curious about greap thoughts on the controller-less solution from Aerohive?
The AP expects a response from the controller within 2 seconds, otherwise it sends up to 5 more hearbeat packets at 1 sec. We have tried deploymenh do ans sharing by dividing groups to both controller. You would have to manually configure the information on both. That way it’s easier to remain on top of the changes in an incremental fashion, rather than trying to figure out what changed from a year ago and three releases ago: In this post, I will build on those basic fundamentals and provide more depth on the recommended deployment guidelines if you’re thinking about deploying H-REAP for remote sites.
Local controller at remote site is primary controller for the APs at ghide site and centrally located controller is secondary controller for the APs at remote site.